Ok, so I put together my first ever webquest last night during the E-course. It ticked all the boxes in terms of the criteria we needed to meet, but it wasnt quite finished, as I wanted to trial it in a lesson today. So, I came home, had some dinner, and then got back to it. Both the draft and the final piece that was given out in class today are linked to this blog.
Here are my thoughts about its effectiveness now that I have delivered the lesson and am sitting in the comfort of my own home again:
Reasons I like it and want to use it again:
1) Obviously, I am able to manipulate the content that the students look at, in a way that it is possible to filter out some of the irrelevant bits of information that they might normally have to trawl through
2) Due to this control factor, I can also work out very easily if students have understood, and actually summarised the information into their own words, which,
3) Helps to control any potential plagiarism, cutting down on the hours of trawling internet sites that I might normally do.
4) Crucially, it allows the students to hone their skills of deduction/summarising/reading text and understanding it in a slightly manipulated (and therefore, hopefully more productive) environment.
Reasons why it made my day a bit/lot more frustrating and I want to forget about WebQuesting forever:
1) After my first use of it I have realised that because this isn't a task they are accustomed to, I still need to 'hold their hand' with it a little bit. I assumed I would give them the webquest sheet, and that they would get straight down to business, and be finished in a matter of minutes. 2 hours (yes, 120 minutes) later, I was still trying to explain to some of the class that if they looked at the webquest sheet it would actually tell them EXACTLY what to do. And, in fairness, it was a very straightforward sheet - i.e click this, read that, answer in the box provided. I am often too harsh on myself and very critical about lessons that went wrong, and how it was my fault, but I''m not taking the credit for that today in terms of ease of use of the sheet! 100 other things were wrong, but the instructions on the sheet itself was OK
2) However, what is very evident is that my students have been used to being directed in a certain way ("google it"), and it will take them (and me) a while to get used to this new method. I think I may have expected too much in terms of them applying themselves fully to the task (how I expected them to all of a sudden not want to go on Youtube and Facebook anymore, I will never quite understand. What a moron!)
3) Facebook is still the bane of my working day! I thought this task might cut down on Facebook use, but alas, not so much. I reckon this may be due to the fact that I included too many tasks for them to complete. Or rather, the fact that I didn't break the tasks down into small chunks, which made the whole thing seem quite daunting and unmanageable (even though there was actually about 45 minutes worth of work there). This, I put down to my overenthusiasm for a new method, coupled with my blind faith that the method itself would work the miracle. Due to this, I lost sight of some of the 'Teaching 101' rules that should be followed in every lesson, whether one has an exciting new tool to try or not! I still definitely don't have the answer to this little problem, but I'm now thinking about tactics I normally apply, and how they could relate in this scenario. For example, they LOVE to be in competition with each other. If I had used the countdown timer from classtools.net I could have set each individual task with a short turn around time. The tasks would have been possible in this short turn around, because I had already 'vetted' and approved the information they were going to be reading. This would have focused them a lot more, and would have resulted, ultimately, in me getting home in time to do my big Tesco shop!
4) This is no great surprise to me, but there is A LOT of rubbish on the internet. Even when I found relevant webpages, often I couldn't find all the information I needed for an answer on one website. To try and link lots of websites to the WQ just for them to answer one question would have been very confusing, and time consuming. Of course, all this actually highlights is that sometimes a Powerpoint (or something more exciting, Martin?!) can be of better use, and that not all methods are suitable for all learning circumstances.
In summary, I enjoyed learning about WebQuesting, I enjoyed putting a WebQuest together, and call me sadistic, but I have actually enjoyed trialling it, despite it being a total fiasco. I guess all the best lessons (for me as a teacher) come from reflecting upon a slight disaster! I will be using WebQuesting again, but I will just be better at it.....
very honest and detailed reflection/ evaulation of a session- thank you. It doesn't actually sound like the total disasster you suggest. Have another think 9in the cold light of day) and ask yourself 'despite the issues- many of which you have suggested sensible and practical solutions to- did they learn anything?' if the answer is still no then ok but I suspect they got something from it. I agree with your comments about the breaking down of the tasks- sometimes I do wonder why simple instructions cannot be followed. when I'm feeling uncharitable i think it's blody mindedness or stupidity! But then, a bunch of teachers will miss what i think is a clear instruction
ReplyDelete